Nauru vs Tuvalu: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Nauru
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 34.27 t against 6.23 t in Nauru, a difference of 28.04 t.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 5.5 times Nauru's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 200th and Tuvalu ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.4 t | 11.37 t | 8.97 t | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 3.27 t | 11.57 t | 8.3 t | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 4.54 t | 17.04 t | 12.49 t | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 5.7 t | 27.33 t | 21.63 t | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 5.9 t | 32.09 t | 26.2 t | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 6.18 t | 34.18 t | 28 t | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 6.26 t | 34.42 t | 28.15 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Nauru or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 34.27 t against 6.23 t in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Nauru and Tuvalu?
- 28.04 t, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Nauru ranks 200th and Tuvalu ranks 198th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).