North Macedonia vs Rwanda: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- North Macedonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 8,560 t against 7,888 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 672 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 133rd and Rwanda ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,770 t | 1,114 t | 10,656 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 9,150 t | 2,702 t | 6,448 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 10,014 t | 7,801 t | 2,212 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 8,472 t | 9,429 t | 956.82 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, North Macedonia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 8,560 t against 7,888 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 672 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Rwanda rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- North Macedonia ranks 133rd and Rwanda ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).