Norway vs Tajikistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Norway
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Norway currently reports 45,850 t against 41,576 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 4,274 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 76th and Tajikistan ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47,330 t | 19,689 t | 27,641 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 45,128 t | 12,300 t | 32,828 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 43,827 t | 20,593 t | 23,234 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 46,438 t | 40,972 t | 5,466 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Norway or Tajikistan?
- Norway, at 45,850 t against 41,576 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Norway and Tajikistan?
- 4,274 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Norway and Tajikistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Norway ranks 76th and Tajikistan ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).