Pakistan vs Viet Nam: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Pakistan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.49 million t against 628,707 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 860,963 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 2.4 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 84,105 t | 42,251 t | 41,853 t | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 202,035 t | 79,212 t | 122,823 t | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 413,877 t | 127,068 t | 286,809 t | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 668,869 t | 297,225 t | 371,644 t | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 961,417 t | 423,319 t | 538,098 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 1.21 million t | 514,506 t | 698,063 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1.43 million t | 597,095 t | 830,508 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Pakistan or Viet Nam?
- Pakistan, at 1.49 million t against 628,707 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Pakistan and Viet Nam?
- 860,963 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Pakistan and Viet Nam rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Pakistan ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).