Poland vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Poland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 387,795 t against 375,128 t in Poland, a difference of 12,667 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Poland ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 312,061 t | 268,553 t | 43,508 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 330,177 t | 210,252 t | 119,925 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 354,371 t | 282,933 t | 71,438 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 339,460 t | 366,980 t | 27,520 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Poland or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 387,795 t against 375,128 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 12,667 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Poland ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).