Russian Federation vs Thailand: Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Russian Federation
- Thailand
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 1.01 million t against 855,954 t in Thailand, a difference of 154,056 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Thailand's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 10th of 201 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 982,678 t | 298,289 t | 684,389 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 661,015 t | 397,336 t | 263,679 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 749,042 t | 506,730 t | 242,313 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 974,844 t | 609,648 t | 365,196 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation β cropland nitrogen, Russian Federation or Thailand?
- Russian Federation, at 1.01 million t against 855,954 t in Thailand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation β cropland nitrogen between Russian Federation and Thailand?
- 154,056 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Thailand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Thailand rank globally for volatilisation β cropland nitrogen?
- Russian Federation ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 10th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).