Singapore vs Tonga: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Singapore
- Tonga
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 265.75 t against 227.58 t in Tonga, a difference of 38.17 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Tonga's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 177th and Tonga ranks 180th of 201 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,605 t | 65.89 t | 1,539 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 2,054 t | 125.48 t | 1,929 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 1,707 t | 225.37 t | 1,482 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 995.25 t | 200.29 t | 794.96 t | Singapore |
| 2000s | 326.97 t | 203.94 t | 123.03 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 294.86 t | 221.61 t | 73.24 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 273.62 t | 229.99 t | 43.63 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Singapore or Tonga?
- Singapore, at 265.75 t against 227.58 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Singapore and Tonga?
- 38.17 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Singapore and Tonga rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Singapore ranks 177th and Tonga ranks 180th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).