Singapore vs Vanuatu: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Singapore
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 301.01 t against 265.75 t in Singapore, a difference of 35.26 t.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 177th and Vanuatu ranks 175th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 4 and Vanuatu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,605 t | 177.1 t | 1,427 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 2,054 t | 246.51 t | 1,808 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 1,707 t | 280.31 t | 1,427 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 995.25 t | 312.38 t | 682.87 t | Singapore |
| 2000s | 326.97 t | 368.71 t | 41.74 t | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 294.86 t | 397.4 t | 102.54 t | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 273.62 t | 307.69 t | 34.06 t | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Singapore or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 301.01 t against 265.75 t in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Singapore and Vanuatu?
- 35.26 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Vanuatu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Singapore and Vanuatu rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Singapore ranks 177th and Vanuatu ranks 175th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).