Slovakia vs Sri Lanka: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Slovakia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 39,588 t against 39,194 t in Slovakia, a difference of 394 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38,339 t | 43,042 t | 4,703 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 36,052 t | 55,129 t | 19,076 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 43,269 t | 48,362 t | 5,093 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 43,056 t | 48,870 t | 5,813 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Slovakia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 39,588 t against 39,194 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Slovakia and Sri Lanka?
- 394 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sri Lanka?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Sri Lanka rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Slovakia ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).