Southern Africa vs Ukraine: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Southern Africa
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 324,610 t against 145,027 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 179,583 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 2.2 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Southern Africa ranks 21st and Ukraine ranks 23rd of 38 regions.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 125,775 t | 395,094 t | 269,319 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 134,582 t | 238,143 t | 103,561 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 143,334 t | 382,522 t | 239,188 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 173,908 t | 449,203 t | 275,295 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Southern Africa or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 324,610 t against 145,027 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Southern Africa and Ukraine?
- 179,583 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Ukraine rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Southern Africa ranks 21st and Ukraine ranks 23rd of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).