Spain vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Spain
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 387,795 t against 376,990 t in Spain, a difference of 10,805 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 443,248 t | 268,553 t | 174,695 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 452,256 t | 210,252 t | 242,004 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 449,330 t | 282,933 t | 166,396 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 425,348 t | 366,980 t | 58,367 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Spain or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 387,795 t against 376,990 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Spain and Uzbekistan?
- 10,805 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Spain ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).