Sudan (former) vs Uruguay: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sudan (former)
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 65,712 t against 63,032 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 2,680 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Sudan (former) ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,706 t | 9,873 t | 4,833 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 22,912 t | 11,502 t | 11,410 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 32,925 t | 13,760 t | 19,165 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 34,013 t | 19,192 t | 14,821 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 51,755 t | 29,629 t | 22,125 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 69,822 t | 49,989 t | 19,833 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Sudan (former) or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 65,712 t against 63,032 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Sudan (former) and Uruguay?
- 2,680 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Uruguay?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Uruguay rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Sudan (former) ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).