Sudan vs Uruguay: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sudan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 65,712 t against 61,858 t in Sudan, a difference of 3,854 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uruguay ahead.
Sudan ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 54,700 t | 56,888 t | 2,188 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 71,695 t | 68,326 t | 3,369 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Sudan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 65,712 t against 61,858 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Sudan and Uruguay?
- 3,854 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Uruguay rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Sudan ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).