Switzerland vs Tunisia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Switzerland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 24,408 t against 23,512 t in Switzerland, a difference of 896 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Switzerland ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Switzerland averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Switzerland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,250 t | 2,992 t | 21,259 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 29,992 t | 7,591 t | 22,401 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 33,972 t | 14,081 t | 19,891 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 30,384 t | 17,979 t | 12,405 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 26,336 t | 23,926 t | 2,410 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 25,453 t | 28,106 t | 2,653 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 23,662 t | 30,866 t | 7,204 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Switzerland or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 24,408 t against 23,512 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Switzerland and Tunisia?
- 896 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Switzerland and Tunisia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Switzerland ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).