Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Uganda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 35,117 t against 34,167 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 950 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Uganda ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,565 t | 11,978 t | 9,413 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 3,647 t | 22,296 t | 18,649 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 4,489 t | 29,244 t | 24,755 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 9,805 t | 30,443 t | 20,638 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 16,130 t | 23,891 t | 7,761 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 26,296 t | 20,768 t | 5,529 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 33,759 t | 36,561 t | 2,802 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
- Uganda, at 35,117 t against 34,167 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 950 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Uganda ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).