Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Polynesia: Volatilisation — Cropland phosphorus
Volatilisation — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Polynesia
How they compare
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Polynesia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st and Polynesia ranks 1st of 29 groups.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland phosphorus, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Polynesia?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 0 t against 0 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland phosphorus between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Polynesia?
- 0 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Polynesia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland phosphorus?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st and Polynesia ranks 1st of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).