Georgia vs Iceland: Water accounts - assets — Evaporation and actual evapotranspiration

Georgia
36.3 Cubic metres
in 2024
Iceland
30 Cubic metres
in 2024
Georgia rank
28th
Iceland rank
29th

Water accounts - assets — Evaporation and actual evapotranspiration over time

  • Georgia
  • Iceland
010203040198020022024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 36.3 Cubic metres against 30 Cubic metres in Iceland, a difference of 6.3 Cubic metres.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 28th and Iceland ranks 29th of 36 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Iceland Difference Ahead
1980s 36.3 Cubic metres 30 Cubic metres 6.3 Cubic metres Georgia
1990s 36.3 Cubic metres 30 Cubic metres 6.3 Cubic metres Georgia
2000s 36.3 Cubic metres 30 Cubic metres 6.3 Cubic metres Georgia
2010s 36.3 Cubic metres 30 Cubic metres 6.3 Cubic metres Georgia
2020s 36.3 Cubic metres 30 Cubic metres 6.3 Cubic metres Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher water accounts - assets — evaporation and actual evapotranspiration, Georgia or Iceland?
Georgia, at 36.3 Cubic metres against 30 Cubic metres in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in water accounts - assets — evaporation and actual evapotranspiration between Georgia and Iceland?
6.3 Cubic metres, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for water accounts - assets — evaporation and actual evapotranspiration?
Georgia ranks 28th and Iceland ranks 29th of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Water accounts - assets — Evaporation and actual evapotranspiration. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Iceland: Water accounts - assets — Evaporation and actual evapotranspiration. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/water-accounts-assets-evaporation-and-actual-evapotranspiration/georgia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/water-accounts-assets-evaporation-and-actual-evapotranspiration/georgia/iceland/">Georgia vs Iceland: Water accounts - assets — Evaporation and actual evapotranspiration</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Water accounts - assets — Evaporation and actual evapotranspiration
Unit
Cubic metres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
47 places, 2,115 data points, 1980–2024
Last refreshed

Water flow accounts describe flows of water, in physical units, encompassing the initial abstraction of water resources from the environment into the economy, to the water flows within the economy in the form of supply and use by industries and households, and finally, flows of water back to the environment. Asset accounts for water resources focus on the inflows and outflows of water to and from the land surface and subsurface, and on the destination of these flows. They present information on the stock of water at the beginning and end of an accounting period. Data source(s): Joint OECD/Eurostat questionnaire on Inland Waters. Data for non-OECD countries is sourced from UNSD (https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envstats/country_files) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: August 7, 2026 Database documentation