Botswana vs New Zealand: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Botswana
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0 ha per person
in 2024
Botswana rank
91st
New Zealand rank
92nd
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Botswana
- New Zealand
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0 ha per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was New Zealand ahead.
Botswana ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 116 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Botswana or New Zealand?
- Botswana, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0 ha per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Botswana and New Zealand?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and New Zealand rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Botswana ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.