Costa Rica vs Grenada: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Costa Rica
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Grenada
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
29th
Grenada rank
28th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 29th and Grenada ranks 28th of 116 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Costa Rica or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Costa Rica and Grenada?
- 0 ha per person, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Grenada?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Grenada rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 29th and Grenada ranks 28th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.