Dominican Republic vs Italy: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Dominican Republic
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Italy
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
48th
Italy rank
49th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Dominican Republic
- Italy
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in Italy, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Italy ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 48th and Italy ranks 49th of 116 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Italy |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Dominican Republic or Italy?
- Dominican Republic, at 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Dominican Republic and Italy?
- 0 ha per person, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Italy?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and Italy rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Dominican Republic ranks 48th and Italy ranks 49th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.