Georgia vs Italy: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Georgia
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Italy
0.0003 ha per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
50th
Italy rank
49th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in Georgia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 50th and Italy ranks 49th of 116 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Georgia or Italy?
- Italy, at 0.0003 ha per person against 0.0003 ha per person in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Georgia and Italy?
- 0 ha per person, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Italy?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Italy rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 50th and Italy ranks 49th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.