Hungary vs Romania: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Hungary
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
Romania
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
37th
Romania rank
34th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Hungary
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.0004 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Hungary, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 37th and Romania ranks 34th of 116 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Hungary or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.0004 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Hungary and Romania?
- 0 ha per person, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Romania?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Romania rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 37th and Romania ranks 34th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.