Jordan vs Puerto Rico: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Jordan
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
78th
Puerto Rico rank
76th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Jordan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 78th and Puerto Rico ranks 76th of 116 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Jordan or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Jordan and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Puerto Rico?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Puerto Rico rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 78th and Puerto Rico ranks 76th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.