Kuwait vs Malawi: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Kuwait
0 ha per person
in 2024
Malawi
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kuwait rank
104th
Malawi rank
105th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Kuwait
- Malawi
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malawi ahead.
Kuwait ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 105th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Kuwait or Malawi?
- Kuwait, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Kuwait and Malawi?
- 0 ha per person, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Kuwait and Malawi rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Kuwait ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 105th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.