Pakistan vs Puerto Rico: Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita
Pakistan
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
73rd
Puerto Rico rank
76th
Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Pakistan
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 73rd and Puerto Rico ranks 76th of 116 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — area harvested, per capita, Pakistan or Puerto Rico?
- Pakistan, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — area harvested, per capita between Pakistan and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Puerto Rico?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Puerto Rico rank globally for watermelons — area harvested, per capita?
- Pakistan ranks 73rd and Puerto Rico ranks 76th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.