Afghanistan vs Serbia: Watermelons — Production, per capita
Afghanistan
0.0277 t per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.0274 t per person
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
19th
Serbia rank
20th
Watermelons — Production, per capita over time
- Afghanistan
- Serbia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0.0277 t per person against 0.0274 t per person in Serbia, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 20th of 116 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0082 t per person | 0.032 t per person | 0.0238 t per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0125 t per person | 0.0303 t per person | 0.0178 t per person | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.025 t per person | 0.0242 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — production, per capita, Afghanistan or Serbia?
- Afghanistan, at 0.0277 t per person against 0.0274 t per person in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — production, per capita between Afghanistan and Serbia?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Serbia rank globally for watermelons — production, per capita?
- Afghanistan ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 20th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.