Canada vs Namibia: Watermelons — Production, per capita
Canada
0.001 t per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0012 t per person
in 2024
Canada rank
90th
Namibia rank
88th
Watermelons — Production, per capita over time
- Canada
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0012 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Canada, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 88th of 116 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0019 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — production, per capita, Canada or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0012 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — production, per capita between Canada and Namibia?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Namibia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Namibia rank globally for watermelons — production, per capita?
- Canada ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 88th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.