Cuba vs Pakistan: Watermelons — Production, per capita
Cuba
0.0044 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0046 t per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
60th
Pakistan rank
57th
Watermelons — Production, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0046 t per person against 0.0044 t per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Pakistan ahead.
Cuba ranks 60th and Pakistan ranks 57th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0023 t per person | 0.0033 t per person | 0.001 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.0061 t per person | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0039 t per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0059 t per person | 0.0028 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0042 t per person | 0.0058 t per person | 0.0017 t per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — production, per capita, Cuba or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0046 t per person against 0.0044 t per person in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — production, per capita between Cuba and Pakistan?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Pakistan rank globally for watermelons — production, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 60th and Pakistan ranks 57th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.