Egypt vs Malta: Watermelons — Production, per capita
Egypt
0.0061 t per person
in 2024
Malta
0.0057 t per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
52nd
Malta rank
54th
Watermelons — Production, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Malta
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0.0061 t per person against 0.0057 t per person in Malta, a difference of 0.0004 t per person.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 52nd and Malta ranks 54th of 116 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0218 t per person | 0.0097 t per person | 0.012 t per person | Egypt |
| 2000s | 0.0215 t per person | 0.0114 t per person | 0.0101 t per person | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0.0162 t per person | 0.0078 t per person | 0.0084 t per person | Egypt |
| 2020s | 0.008 t per person | 0.0061 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — production, per capita, Egypt or Malta?
- Egypt, at 0.0061 t per person against 0.0057 t per person in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — production, per capita between Egypt and Malta?
- 0.0004 t per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malta?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Malta rank globally for watermelons — production, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 52nd and Malta ranks 54th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.