Malawi vs Slovenia: Watermelons — Production, per square kilometre
Malawi
0.0324 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0338 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
93rd
Slovenia rank
90th
Watermelons — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Malawi
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.0338 t per square kilometre against 0.0324 t per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0014 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 93rd and Slovenia ranks 90th of 115 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0322 t per square kilometre | 0.0271 t per square kilometre | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.0324 t per square kilometre | 0.0302 t per square kilometre | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — production, per square kilometre, Malawi or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.0338 t per square kilometre against 0.0324 t per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in watermelons — production, per square kilometre between Malawi and Slovenia?
- 0.0014 t per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for watermelons — production, per square kilometre?
- Malawi ranks 93rd and Slovenia ranks 90th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.