Chile vs Malta: Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
83rd
Malta rank
86th
Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Malta
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Malta ahead.
Chile ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 86th of 116 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher watermelons — production, per unit of gdp, Chile or Malta?
- Chile, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in watermelons — production, per unit of gdp between Chile and Malta?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malta?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Malta rank globally for watermelons — production, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 86th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Watermelons — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.