Eswatini vs United Republic of Tanzania: Wood-based panels — Export quantity, annual growth rate

Eswatini
-51.37 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
-46.42 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
174th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
172nd

Wood-based panels — Export quantity, annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02505007501.0k196419942024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports -46.42 % change on previous year against -51.37 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 4.95 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1966 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Eswatini ranks 174th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 172nd of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 112.5 % change on previous year 21.22 % change on previous year 91.28 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s 12.85 % change on previous year -7.44 % change on previous year 20.29 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 6.38 % change on previous year 16.82 % change on previous year 10.44 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s -20 % change on previous year -3.33 % change on previous year 16.67 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 128.24 % change on previous year 118.9 % change on previous year 9.34 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s -5.9 % change on previous year 22.59 % change on previous year 28.49 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wood-based panels — export quantity, annual growth rate, Eswatini or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at -46.42 % change on previous year against -51.37 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in wood-based panels — export quantity, annual growth rate between Eswatini and United Republic of Tanzania?
4.95 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and United Republic of Tanzania?
43 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for wood-based panels — export quantity, annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 174th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 172nd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs United Republic of Tanzania: Wood-based panels — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-based-panels-export-quantity-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-based-panels-export-quantity-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Eswatini vs United Republic of Tanzania: Wood-based panels — Export quantity, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wood-based panels — Export quantity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 9,503 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Wood-based panels — Export quantity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.