How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uganda?

44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Uganda: Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre

Guatemala

0.2117 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Uganda

0.2165 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Guatemala rank

57th

Uganda rank

56th

Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre over time

Guatemala
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.2165 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2117 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0048 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 57th and Uganda ranks 56th of 195 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0022 1000 USD per square kilometre	Guatemala
1970s	0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre	Guatemala
1990s	0.0246 1000 USD per square kilometre	0 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0245 1000 USD per square kilometre	Guatemala
2000s	0.0539 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0042 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0497 1000 USD per square kilometre	Guatemala
2010s	0.1658 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0636 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1022 1000 USD per square kilometre	Guatemala
2020s	0.2232 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.204 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0192 1000 USD per square kilometre	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wood-based panels — export value, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Uganda?: Uganda, at 0.2165 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2117 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in wood-based panels — export value, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Uganda?: 0.0048 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uganda?: 44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Uganda rank globally for wood-based panels — export value, per square kilometre?: Guatemala ranks 57th and Uganda ranks 56th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Uganda: Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-based-panels-export-value-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-based-panels-export-value-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/uganda/">Guatemala vs Uganda: Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Wood-based panels — Export value, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 196 places, 7,379 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Wood-based panels — Export value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.