Chile vs Namibia: Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per capita
Chile
0.0097 m3 per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0092 m3 per person
in 2024
Chile rank
108th
Namibia rank
111th
Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Chile
- Namibia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0097 m3 per person against 0.0092 m3 per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0005 m3 per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Chile ranks 108th and Namibia ranks 111th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0045 m3 per person | 0.0065 m3 per person | 0.002 m3 per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0134 m3 per person | 0.0124 m3 per person | 0.001 m3 per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0155 m3 per person | 0.0099 m3 per person | 0.0057 m3 per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood-based panels — import quantity, per capita, Chile or Namibia?
- Chile, at 0.0097 m3 per person against 0.0092 m3 per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood-based panels — import quantity, per capita between Chile and Namibia?
- 0.0005 m3 per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for wood-based panels — import quantity, per capita?
- Chile ranks 108th and Namibia ranks 111th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood-based panels — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.