Algeria vs Latvia: Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Algeria
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Algeria rank
49th
Latvia rank
48th
Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Algeria
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Algeria, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 48th of 180 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood-based panels — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Algeria or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood-based panels — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Algeria and Latvia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Latvia rank globally for wood-based panels — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Algeria ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 48th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood-based panels — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.