Belarus vs Eritrea: Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Belarus
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Belarus rank
169th
Eritrea rank
167th
Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Belarus
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eritrea ahead.
Belarus ranks 169th and Eritrea ranks 167th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood-based panels — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Belarus or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2011.
- What is the difference in wood-based panels — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Belarus and Eritrea?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eritrea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Eritrea rank globally for wood-based panels — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 169th and Eritrea ranks 167th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood-based panels — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.