Argentina vs Sudan: Wood-based panels — Import value, per unit of GDP
Argentina
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Argentina rank
171st
Sudan rank
170th
Wood-based panels — Import value, per unit of GDP over time
- Argentina
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Argentina, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 170th of 180 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood-based panels — import value, per unit of gdp, Argentina or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood-based panels — import value, per unit of gdp between Argentina and Sudan?
- 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Sudan rank globally for wood-based panels — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Argentina ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 170th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood-based panels — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood-based panels — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.