Aruba vs Latvia: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Aruba
0.0029 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0032 t per person
in 2024
Aruba rank
73rd
Latvia rank
70th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Aruba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0032 t per person against 0.0029 t per person in Aruba, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0015 t per person | 0.0051 t per person | 0.0037 t per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0019 t per person | 0.0053 t per person | 0.0034 t per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0026 t per person | 0.0037 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Aruba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0032 t per person against 0.0029 t per person in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Aruba and Latvia?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Latvia rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Aruba ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 70th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.