Bangladesh vs Croatia: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Bangladesh
0.002 t per person
in 2024
Croatia
0.002 t per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
93rd
Croatia rank
90th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.002 t per person against 0.002 t per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0017 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.002 t per person | 0.0027 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Bangladesh or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 0.002 t per person against 0.002 t per person in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Bangladesh and Croatia?
- 0 t per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Croatia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Croatia rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 90th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.