Costa Rica vs Samoa: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Costa Rica
0.0028 t per person
in 2024
Samoa
0.0029 t per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
74th
Samoa rank
72nd
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.0029 t per person against 0.0028 t per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 74th and Samoa ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0023 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0026 t per person | 0.0025 t per person | 0 t per person | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.0027 t per person | 0.0028 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Costa Rica or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0.0029 t per person against 0.0028 t per person in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Costa Rica and Samoa?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Samoa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Samoa rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 74th and Samoa ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.