Czechia vs Pakistan: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Czechia
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
128th
Pakistan rank
127th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Pakistan ahead.
Czechia ranks 128th and Pakistan ranks 127th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Czechia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Czechia and Pakistan?
- 0 t per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Pakistan rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 128th and Pakistan ranks 127th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.