Iraq vs Montenegro: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Iraq
0.0005 t per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Iraq rank
124th
Montenegro rank
122nd
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Iraq
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Iraq, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Iraq ranks 124th and Montenegro ranks 122nd of 167 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0032 t per person | 0.0025 t per person | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0032 t per person | 0.0026 t per person | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Iraq or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Iraq and Montenegro?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Montenegro rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Iraq ranks 124th and Montenegro ranks 122nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.