Latvia vs Morocco: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Latvia
0.0032 t per person
in 2024
Morocco
0.0033 t per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
70th
Morocco rank
69th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0.0033 t per person against 0.0032 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Morocco ahead.
Latvia ranks 70th and Morocco ranks 69th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Morocco |
| 2000s | 0.0051 t per person | 0.0032 t per person | 0.0019 t per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0053 t per person | 0.0033 t per person | 0.002 t per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0037 t per person | 0.0033 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Latvia or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 0.0033 t per person against 0.0032 t per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Latvia and Morocco?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Morocco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Morocco rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 70th and Morocco ranks 69th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.