Nicaragua vs Serbia: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Nicaragua
0.0023 t per person
in 2023
Serbia
0.0026 t per person
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
81st
Serbia rank
78th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0026 t per person against 0.0023 t per person in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0047 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0037 t per person | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0039 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0024 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.0026 t per person against 0.0023 t per person in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Nicaragua ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 78th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.