Pakistan vs Slovenia: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Pakistan
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan rank
127th
Slovenia rank
130th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Pakistan
- Slovenia
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 127th and Slovenia ranks 130th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0004 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0 t per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Pakistan or Slovenia?
- Pakistan, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Pakistan and Slovenia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Slovenia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Slovenia rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Pakistan ranks 127th and Slovenia ranks 130th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.