Portugal vs Slovakia: Wood charcoal — Production, per capita
Portugal
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Slovakia
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Portugal rank
112th
Slovakia rank
113th
Wood charcoal — Production, per capita over time
- Portugal
- Slovakia
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Slovakia, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 112th and Slovakia ranks 113th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0015 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0.0019 t per person | 0.0097 t per person | 0.0078 t per person | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood charcoal — production, per capita, Portugal or Slovakia?
- Portugal, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood charcoal — production, per capita between Portugal and Slovakia?
- 0 t per person, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Slovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Portugal and Slovakia rank globally for wood charcoal — production, per capita?
- Portugal ranks 112th and Slovakia ranks 113th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood charcoal — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood charcoal — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.