China vs Montenegro: Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita
China
0.0419 m3 per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.0522 m3 per person
in 2024
China rank
33rd
Montenegro rank
31st
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- China
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.0522 m3 per person against 0.0419 m3 per person in China, a difference of 0.0103 m3 per person.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times China's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
China ranks 33rd and Montenegro ranks 31st of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0607 m3 per person | 0.0386 m3 per person | 0.0221 m3 per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0514 m3 per person | 0.0434 m3 per person | 0.008 m3 per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0434 m3 per person | 0.0741 m3 per person | 0.0307 m3 per person | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita, China or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.0522 m3 per person against 0.0419 m3 per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita between China and Montenegro?
- 0.0103 m3 per person, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do China and Montenegro rank globally for wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita?
- China ranks 33rd and Montenegro ranks 31st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.