Eswatini vs Germany: Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita
Eswatini
0.0966 m3 per person
in 2024
Germany
0.1221 m3 per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
20th
Germany rank
17th
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0.1221 m3 per person against 0.0966 m3 per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0255 m3 per person.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Germany ahead.
Eswatini ranks 20th and Germany ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0.1228 m3 per person | 0.1228 m3 per person | Germany |
| 2010s | 0.0308 m3 per person | 0.1198 m3 per person | 0.089 m3 per person | Germany |
| 2020s | 0.0985 m3 per person | 0.1174 m3 per person | 0.0188 m3 per person | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita, Eswatini or Germany?
- Germany, at 0.1221 m3 per person against 0.0966 m3 per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita between Eswatini and Germany?
- 0.0255 m3 per person, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Germany?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Germany rank globally for wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 20th and Germany ranks 17th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.