Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita
Eswatini
0.0966 m3 per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.0998 m3 per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
20th
Nicaragua rank
19th
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.0998 m3 per person against 0.0966 m3 per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0032 m3 per person.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 20th and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 167 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 m3 per person | 0.118 m3 per person | 0.118 m3 per person | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.0308 m3 per person | 0.111 m3 per person | 0.0802 m3 per person | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0.099 m3 per person | 0.1017 m3 per person | 0.0026 m3 per person | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita, Eswatini or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.0998 m3 per person against 0.0966 m3 per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita between Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 0.0032 m3 per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Nicaragua rank globally for wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 20th and Nicaragua ranks 19th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.