Liechtenstein vs Serbia: Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita
Liechtenstein
0.0164 m3 per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.017 m3 per person
in 2024
Liechtenstein rank
46th
Serbia rank
44th
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita over time
- Liechtenstein
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.017 m3 per person against 0.0164 m3 per person in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.0006 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 44th of 167 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1898 m3 per person | 0.0103 m3 per person | 0.1795 m3 per person | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 0.0895 m3 per person | 0.0159 m3 per person | 0.0735 m3 per person | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 0.0226 m3 per person | 0.0194 m3 per person | 0.0032 m3 per person | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita, Liechtenstein or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.017 m3 per person against 0.0164 m3 per person in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita between Liechtenstein and Serbia?
- 0.0006 m3 per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Liechtenstein and Serbia rank globally for wood fuel, coniferous — production, per capita?
- Liechtenstein ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 44th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel, coniferous — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel, coniferous — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.